30 Apr 2014
A devastating critique of flawed proposals for judicial review
Evidence is lacking to support the government’s proposed reforms to judicial review, the Joint Committee on Human Rights reports today.
The Committee has found that the proposals expose the conflict inherent in the combined roles of the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, and it calls for a thoroughgoing review of the issues raised by the Minister’s dual role.
Responding to the report, Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said:
“This is a devastating critique of the failure to grasp the complexity of the conflict of interest inherent in the dual role of politician and legal champion. Unfortunately the error has been to concentrate on the politics while the rule of law has suffered.”
Notes to editors
- The Howard League for Penal Reform is the oldest penal reform charity in the world. It is a national charity working for less crime, safer communities and fewer people in prison.
- The Joint Committee on Human Rights’ Thirteenth Report of Session 2013-14,The implications for access to justice of the Government’s proposals to reform judicial review, is to be published on the committee’s website.
Tel: +44 (0)20 7241 7880
Mobile: +44 (0)7714 604955
For enquiries outside normal office hours, please call +44 (0)7918 681094
ISDN line available on 020 7923 4196 – uses a G722 system
Add your voice to our movement for change. Every voice counts and we hope that you will add yours.Join us today
Support our work
Everything we do is focused on achieving less crime, safer communities, fewer people in prison. We need you to act now for penal reform.Ways to support